Skip to main content

Apple fails to end lawsuit claiming it 'broke' FaceTime

A woman looks at the screen of her mobile phone in front of an Apple logo outside its store in Shanghai © REUTERS/Aly Song A woman looks at the screen of her mobile phone in front of an Apple logo outside its store in Shanghai Apple Inc (AAPL.O) has failed in its bid to dismiss a lawsuit claiming it disabled the popular FaceTime video conferencing feature on older iPhones to force users to upgrade.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled late on Friday that iPhone 4 and 4S users can pursue nationwide class action claims that Apple intentionally "broke" FaceTime to save money from routing calls through servers owned by Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM.O).

Neither Apple nor lawyers for the plaintiffs immediately responded on Monday to requests for comment.

Apple began using Akamai's servers after losing a lawsuit in 2012 in which VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC.A) claimed that FaceTime technology infringed its patents.

Testimony from a 2016 retrial in that case showed that Apple paid Akamai $50 million in one six-month period.

The plaintiffs said Apple eventually created a cheaper alternative for its iOS 7 operating system, and in April 2014 disabled FaceTime on iOS 6 and earlier systems.

Koh said the plaintiffs alleged some measurable loss to their phones' value, and could try to show that Cupertino, California-based Apple's conduct constituted a trespass and violated state consumer protection laws.

The San Jose, California-based judge twice quoted from what the plaintiffs said was an Apple employee's internal email characterizing iOS 6 users as "basically screwed" because of the disabling of FaceTime.

She also rejected Apple's argument that the plaintiffs suffered no economic loss because FaceTime was a "free" service.

"FaceTime is a 'feature' of the iPhone and thus a component of the iPhone's cost," Koh said in a footnote. "Indeed, Apple advertised FaceTime as 'one more thing that makes an iPhone an iPhone.'"

The plaintiffs are led by Christina Grace of Marin County, California, and Ken Potter of San Diego County, California, who both owned the iPhone 4. Akamai was not named as a defendant.

The case is Grace et al v Apple Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 17-00551.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Howard Goller)

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

R. Tiglao Exposed LTO Records Showing Aquino Never Bought or Sold a Porsche

Veteran columnist Rigoberto Tiglao exposed the Land Transportation Office (LTO) records of former President Benigno Aquino III showing that he never bought or sold an expensive Porsche car. The LTO records proved that the former President did not sold his Porsche 911 Carrera car which he claimed he bought for P5 million. The controversial Porsche car of the former President made headlines just months into his presidency but he explained that he bought the luxury car with the proceeds he got when he sold his BMW. Because of the furor from such display of opulence, Pres. Aquino claimed to have sold it six months later for exactly the same price. According to Tiglao during that time he asked through his column the LTO to release the car's deed of sale and registration to prove that it was not a gift from a Chinese-Filipino tycoon as rumored by some individuals critical to the President. The only possible way to discover whether the Porsche luxury was indeed sold was through ...
Read more

Samsung is catering to its American customers by providing a $50 screen replacement service

Owners of Galaxy smartphones in the US can get the display of their device replaced for $50 from Samsung. Including the District of Columbia, the new program is available everywhere in the United States. As of June 27th, the discounted repair program will end. The list of compatible Galaxy smartphones may be found in the […] The post Samsung is catering to its American customers by providing a $50 screen replacement service appeared first on Gadgets Village .
Read more

There is talk of the forthcoming release of a Vivo Y77 series phone that will allow 80W charging

Recently, a Vivo phone with the model number V2219A was discovered in TENAA’s certification database. The gadget’s final name is yet unknown. It was first thought to be released as an X-series phone. On the other hand, information leaker Blad says it will be released as a Y-series device. The source says the V2219A will […] The post There is talk of the forthcoming release of a Vivo Y77 series phone that will allow 80W charging appeared first on Gadgets Village .
Read more